I should be very careful with my choice of terms as I have been offended by some other peoples use of words.
On the other hand I am not attributing that term to anyone in particular. I will say on issues as complex as this there is no real right or wrong just many different opinions.
My position is that we need to find ways to allow more affordable housing options in the downtown (whole county really). So we need to find ways that will help achieve that goal.
Is there any possibility that the entire area in the "map" would be covered with 200 units / acre? I think not. Just as the ability for property owners to build 18 story buildings under the previous downtown zoning did not fill the city with those type buildings (just the bayfront - which at least it is not directly on the water...)
I very much agree that the full details are not understood (especially by me) and certainly should be discussed. But I think the full details really don't yet exist since this is still a "process" not a final deal..
FUD
I should be very careful with my choice of terms as I have been offended by some other peoples use of words.
On the other hand I am not attributing that term to anyone in particular. I will say on issues as complex as this there is no real right or wrong just many different opinions.
My position is that we need to find ways to allow more affordable housing options in the downtown (whole county really). So we need to find ways that will help achieve that goal.
Is there any possibility that the entire area in the "map" would be covered with 200 units / acre? I think not. Just as the ability for property owners to build 18 story buildings under the previous downtown zoning did not fill the city with those type buildings (just the bayfront - which at least it is not directly on the water...)
I very much agree that the full details are not understood (especially by me) and certainly should be discussed. But I think the full details really don't yet exist since this is still a "process" not a final deal..